Has it come down to this, at last?
A scattered few people casually remark that this blog happens to be funny,
and as a result
even Tongkai discusses sacks in his latest post,
the issue of
Whether sacks happen to be fun?
Anyway, my opinion is,
it depends. What kind of sacks?
There's having fun with sacks standing up,
or,
if you're super athletic,
having fun with sacks through
jumping around (imagination is a must here to
enjoy sacks this way).
Of course,
Enjoying sacks this way is a bit
too exciting sometimes and competitive,
some people prefer to use sacks for
other personal purposes,
usually they just
generally have sacks around the house,
i mean, you never know when you need sacks-
So we have Sacks on the table,
sacks in the kitchen,
sacks in the storeroom.
Even in the modern office,
the boss engages in employee-sacks,
regardless of gender.
He can "fire up" his subordinates
by doing it verbally (oral-sacks)
or across the PA system (public-sacks)
or on the phone (phone-sacks),
email (cyber-sacks),
or in the privacy of the office (inner-sacks). <-- [sound it out]
And then, at home, if you still watch old movies, you can see rural farms
where sacks prevail everywhere in barns.
Sacks scene that typically involve
mice indulging in the hidden benefits of sacks.
And usually the scene is set in the summer,
so the farmers have plenty of hot sacks,
(am i getting too far?)
and do you notice
the similarity between poor countries
with thriving prostitution trades
and cheesy WildWildWest kidnapping scenes-
since in both cases,
children are lured into sacks occupations.
Sacks, sacks, sacks,
such a commonplace theme!
Is this what the blog has turned into?
---
oh don't misunderstand please, I'm not complaining that tong-tong has succumbed to start appealing to baser emotions to earn a few cheap laughs, i'm just thinking the blog has become boring, that we discuss traditional rustic carriers.
what were you thinking?
---
oh was fiddling with the anagram genius thing linked through ah bong's blog.
have you ever had that strange feeling that there's a truth to be gained somewhere by connecting two apparently non-related objects of attention?
just found out 'love is blind' can be rearranged to become 'blond is evil'.
A scattered few people casually remark that this blog happens to be funny,
and as a result
even Tongkai discusses sacks in his latest post,
the issue of
Whether sacks happen to be fun?
Anyway, my opinion is,
it depends. What kind of sacks?
There's having fun with sacks standing up,
or,
if you're super athletic,
having fun with sacks through
jumping around (imagination is a must here to
enjoy sacks this way).
Of course,
Enjoying sacks this way is a bit
too exciting sometimes and competitive,
some people prefer to use sacks for
other personal purposes,
usually they just
generally have sacks around the house,
i mean, you never know when you need sacks-
So we have Sacks on the table,
sacks in the kitchen,
sacks in the storeroom.
Even in the modern office,
the boss engages in employee-sacks,
regardless of gender.
He can "fire up" his subordinates
by doing it verbally (oral-sacks)
or across the PA system (public-sacks)
or on the phone (phone-sacks),
email (cyber-sacks),
or in the privacy of the office (inner-sacks). <-- [sound it out]
And then, at home, if you still watch old movies, you can see rural farms
where sacks prevail everywhere in barns.
Sacks scene that typically involve
mice indulging in the hidden benefits of sacks.
And usually the scene is set in the summer,
so the farmers have plenty of hot sacks,
(am i getting too far?)
and do you notice
the similarity between poor countries
with thriving prostitution trades
and cheesy WildWildWest kidnapping scenes-
since in both cases,
children are lured into sacks occupations.
Sacks, sacks, sacks,
such a commonplace theme!
Is this what the blog has turned into?
---
oh don't misunderstand please, I'm not complaining that tong-tong has succumbed to start appealing to baser emotions to earn a few cheap laughs, i'm just thinking the blog has become boring, that we discuss traditional rustic carriers.
what were you thinking?
---
oh was fiddling with the anagram genius thing linked through ah bong's blog.
have you ever had that strange feeling that there's a truth to be gained somewhere by connecting two apparently non-related objects of attention?
just found out 'love is blind' can be rearranged to become 'blond is evil'.
<< Home